That is not so! Attractive advantage of TERA While the main developers justify their actions by that the PoW algorithm has already outlived itself and the distributed registry running on such a consensus cannot provide the characteristics, necessary for full-fledged DApps functionality. As for Ethereum, its blockchain with each fork also gradually moves towards the final transition to the PoS consensus. Both projects work on the PoS consensus algorithm, and this is already a reason not to consider them decentralized. The only thing is that transaction rate both TRON and EOS was obtained detriment of decentralization. This is despite the fact that more DApps allocated in Ethereum. For April 2019 EOS ranks the first in the number of unique users (171k) and transaction volume ($ 3 bln), TRON - the second (71k, 600 mln).
Although Ethereum took the lead in the number of created in its blockchain applications, taking a head start in two years, the competitors who appeared on the market began to drain-away developers to their platforms. On the one hand, indeed, the shown speed was significantly different and gave the opportunity to develop DApps (TRON - 1200 tps, EOS - 4000 tps). They collected millions with the help of ICO and drove by roadmap. In 2017, EOS and TRON acted as projects that found a solution. Ethereum became the first blockchain project that allows the creation of smart contracts and DApps.īut programmers faced difficulty - low transaction speed, which was limited to 20 tps.